Clean Break Agenda? BEHRMAN's reply to Lobdill et alia
See below:
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Informed
Citizens
Sent: 11 August, 2007 14:00
To:
Cc:
Subject: [davidvanosfortexasag] Clean Break Agenda? Re: BEHRMAN's reply
to Lobdill et alia
John Robert BEHRMAN <
wrote:
objective of the conspiracy: execute the PNAC “Clean
Break” agenda.
-------
John, WHAT was the "Clean Break" agenda?
[::JRB]
the Clinton Administration for the Government of Israel. It counseled breaking
the Oslo Accords and undertaking a unilateral military program by the US and
Israel to break Iraq, Syria, and Iran. Later PNAC proposals were a version of
this for American political audiences. There is nothing conspiratorial about
this.
Was the phrase "America Redefined", broadcast so
frequently after 9-11 in promoting the run up to the illegal invasion of Iraq
synonymous with "Clean Break"?
The objective of the conspiracy I see had three made players
that you did not mention.
1 - The Military hardware and supply industry
[::JRB] The “Blue Dog”
Democrats are simply the Democratic claque for the 1948 “Treaty of Miami”
that fixed the defense budget proportions between the three services and that
ratcheted up those budgets throughout the Cold War. Curiously, the GOP has
rather consistently supported various sorts of capital-intensive “modern”
or, lately, “transformational” defense budgets, whereas the “Blue
Dogs” are for more and more of whatever General McCLELLAN wants. The
GOP is into military folly and the “Blue Dogs” enamored of military
reaction. The Democratic Party establishment, “cringing liberals”,
just want everybody to “think about the children”. They resolve
these differences between two wrong parties by “splitting the difference”
strapped for funds or by having an ever larger defense budget with no less old
stuff (“Hold Harmless”) plus “Star Wars” and “Stealth
Anything”, albeit with minority and union set-asides, when flush.
The pacifists – ex-Republican
progressives – in the Democratic Party are irrelevant. The actual debate
is between the GOP “Moderates” (capital-intensive) and Democratic “Conservatives”
(reactionary protectionists). And, the Democratic Party, while “advocating
for” smaller defense budgets, “the children”, and so forth
has never actually terminated a single defense program – not one, ever …
The resolution of these conflicts
is to do everything: bombers, battleships, horse cavalry, ray guns, well
distributed among Congressional Districts or larded up with earmarks and
set-asides.
2 - The Oil Cartel (owned primarily by US &
British Elites)
[::JRB]
of the First World War that both party establishments have protected in the
interest of “national security” as defined by financial interests –
mostly WASP, not Jewish -- in both countries. These are aligned with Saudi
Arabia and, now, Iranian exiles. The NeoCons have been and still are hostile to
this cartel. These interests were not behind promotion of (a) the “Clean
Break”, the PNAC, or the actual Iraq war, up until a few months ago when
the “Korean Option” – long-term occupation of huge, remote
bases in Iraq -- surfaced. This scheme is actually beloved of the Democratic
Party establishment, not of the NeoCons.
3 - American Jews whose first loyalty is to the Zionism
rather than to the United States government or the Country & Nation known
as the US of A. Note; Their loyalty is NOT to the people / Jews in
Israel, or even to th e government of Israel. They have their own
agenda.
The "interests" of these three came together on
Iraq.
[::JRB] The NeoCons are best
understood as Trotskyites, not as Jews or Israelis. The LaRouchite rant is a “dialectic”,
not an alternative. There should be no place in the Democratic Party for either
wing of the Trotskyites.
[::JRB] I see no conspiracy at
all. There is a failure of political competition and discipline, including
intelligence and imagination here, no more or less. Listening to YearlyKos, I
picked up in the breakout session on science the notion of virulent
ignorance. That applies to the Darbyites, for sure. The NeoCons are
arrogant but not ignorant. They have “played” both parties expertly.
But, neither of these tiny factions would be important at all, were it not for
the decrepitude of more traditional Democratic and Republican elites. Of these,
the Democratic Party establishment is the most vulnerable and conspicuously in need
of replacement.
1 - Invading Iraq would allow the Elites who own and
operate the Military hardware Supply industry to plunder the people of the
United States of America and their government. Profit they hope to keep into
perpetuity by a never ending war on terrorism.
The same Elites are also owners & controllers of,
or have very close ties to the Oil Cartel. The Oil Cartel would benefit
from keeping 20% of the worlds Oil off the market. A 20% Saddam Hussein would
not let them control. A 20% sitting in the Land known as Iraq. THUS keeping oil
prices at the artificially high level since the first invasion of Iraq, and the
imposition of sanctions limiting Iraq sale of Oil, and sending Oil prices even higher
so they could plunder the people of the United States as well as the rest of
the world. The longer they, too, keep Iraq in chaos the longer they, too,
continue to profit.
The Zionist are well planted in the US State Department
and have greater control of "the patronage system" than either
the Republican party or the Democrat Party, also profit from the Military
Industrial Complex and the Oil Cartel. They are listed as
"Assistants" or "Chief of Staff" but are, in practice, more
like handlers of Dick Cheney (Scooter Libby), Condoleza Rice, Colin
Powell, and others (Richard Peale, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and
others whose names escape me at present).
They also saw Iraq as an opportunity to advance their
Zionist Agenda of a greater Israel and, eventually, Control of the entire
world by "God's Chosen People". The Bush Family
and other "Royalists"/ Elites, in England and elsewhere,
including the likes of the Saudi Royal Family = Elites = work well with
the Zionist because they, too, think that they are "God's Chosen
People" even though they where the label of Christian or Muslim.
There are still a substantial number of extremely wealthy
European Jews who now live elsewhere in the world. They were never really
"religious". The were the real targets of the Nazi regime and others
who perpetrated the genocide of WW II. But they were also the ones that had the
ability to get out before the genocide and take their wealth with them. They
now perpetrate in our US government the same conspiracies of plunder that
create the hate the Europeans had for them. A hate that others, the innocent
Jews, who were sincere about their religion, were victims of in what is
Holocaust.
John - your thinking is all "political". The
actors involved in this conspiracy have NO real
"political" philosophy. Their game is POWER and WEALTH. They PLAY
politics. As you noted, both parties, to achieve Wealth and Power for their
selves. They are too selfish to have a political philosophy. Although they will
pretend they do.
They are NOT advancing a "political" agenda that
they think might benefit the public. Their agenda is all about PLUNDER of the
public and the governments owned by the Public / People, but controlled by
them. That is what makes their conspiracy illegal and a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
They are NOT religious, they are NOT political. They are
PURE EVIL. They just USE religion and USE politics for SELFISH gain. Humans who
are not of their elite group are of no more concern to them than a fire ant is
to you.
[::JRB]
ignorance, most prominent in the Christian right but, by no means, a
monopoly of theirs.
it is an axiom in
political science, that unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is
idle to expect the continua nce of civil liberty, or the capacity for self
government. Quoting the Texas Declaration of Independence;
March 2, 1836.
__._,_.___
in this topic (0)
a new topic
src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/yg/img/logo/ma_grp_160.gif"
alt="Yahoo! Groups">
settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email:
delivery to Daily Digest |
format to Traditional
Your Group | Yahoo! Groups
Terms of Use |
Your Group
Yahoo! News
it all here
Breaking news to
entertainment news
Yahoo! TV
in tonight?
Check Daily Picks &
see what to watch.
HDTV Support
Yahoo! Groups
Help with Samsung
HDTVs and devices
.
src="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=15895735/grpspId=1705060375/msgId=3110/stime=11868
__,_._,___
